Open: 100% | Closed: 0%
Final Report Released On: December 06, 2023
2017-07-I-WI-1
Contract a competent third party to develop a comprehensive combustible dust process safety management system, such as OSHA’s Process Safety Management standard or the requirements in the 2019 edition of NFPA 652, Standard on the Fundamentals of Combustible Dust, Chapter 8, which includes, at a minimum, the following elements:
a. Management of Change for combustible dust;
b. Process Safety Information Management;
c. Management of Audits and Inspections;
d. Fugitive Dust Management;
e. Incident Investigation;
f. Dust Hazard Analyses;
g. Management of Engineering Controls for combustible dust
h. Personal Protective Equipment; and
i. Emergency Preparedness.
Status:
Open - Unacceptable Response/No Response ReceivedThis link opens a new window
Open - Unacceptable Response/No Response Received (O - UR) - Recipient responds by expressing disagreement with the need outlined in the recommendation. The Board believes, however, that there is enough supporting evidence to ask the recipient to reconsider.
Recommendation Status Change SummaryThis link opens a new window
2017-07-I-WI-2
Contract a competent third party to develop and implement modifications to the pneumatic conveying and dust collector ductwork systems in accordance with guidance such as NFPA 61, Standard for the Prevention of Fires and Dust Explosions in Agricultural and Food Processing Facilities, NFPA 652, Standard on the Fundamentals of Combustible Dust, and NFPA 654, Standard for the Prevention of Fire and Dust Explosions from the Manufacturing, Processing, and Handling of Combustible Particulate Solids, to include, at a minimum:
a. Ensure minimum required transport velocity is maintained throughout the system.
b. Implement a periodic inspection and testing program for pneumatic conveying and dust collector ductwork systems, following industry guidance such as NFPA 91, Standard for Exhaust Systems for Air Conveying of Vapors, Gases, Mists, and Particulate Solids, and FM Global guidance. The program should include cleaning on a set frequency and measuring transport velocities on a routine basis to ensure proper system function.
Status:
Open - Unacceptable Response/No Response ReceivedThis link opens a new window
Open - Unacceptable Response/No Response Received (O - UR) - Recipient responds by expressing disagreement with the need outlined in the recommendation. The Board believes, however, that there is enough supporting evidence to ask the recipient to reconsider.
Recommendation Status Change SummaryThis link opens a new window
2017-07-I-WI-3
Contract a competent third party to perform dust hazard analyses (DHAs) on all buildings and units that process combustible dust. Ensure that the DHAs are revalidated at least every five years. Implement pre-deflagration detection, deflagration venting, deflagration suppression, deflagration isolation, and deflagration pressure containment engineering controls identified in the initial and revalidation DHA in accordance with NFPA 61, Standard for the Prevention of Fires and Dust Explosions in Agricultural and Food Processing Facilities, NFPA 68, Standard on Explosion Protection by Deflagration Venting, NFPA 69, Standard on Explosion Prevention Systems, and NFPA 652, Standard on the Fundamentals of Combustible Dust.
Status:
Open - Unacceptable Response/No Response ReceivedThis link opens a new window
Open - Unacceptable Response/No Response Received (O - UR) - Recipient responds by expressing disagreement with the need outlined in the recommendation. The Board believes, however, that there is enough supporting evidence to ask the recipient to reconsider.
Recommendation Status Change SummaryThis link opens a new window
2017-07-I-WI-4
Contract a competent third party to assess and implement engineering controls for the structural design and venting requirements of the reconstructed facility to ensure they meet the requirements and guidance in NFPA 68, Standard on Explosion Protection by Deflagration Venting, for adequacy of venting capacity.
Status:
Open - Unacceptable Response/No Response ReceivedThis link opens a new window
Open - Unacceptable Response/No Response Received (O - UR) - Recipient responds by expressing disagreement with the need outlined in the recommendation. The Board believes, however, that there is enough supporting evidence to ask the recipient to reconsider.
Recommendation Status Change SummaryThis link opens a new window
2017-07-I-WI-5
Incorporate recording any paper-based process safety information into Didion’s existing electronic records management system so that the information can be reliably retained, retrieved, and analyzed in the event of a catastrophic incident.
Status:
Open - Unacceptable Response/No Response ReceivedThis link opens a new window
Open - Unacceptable Response/No Response Received (O - UR) - Recipient responds by expressing disagreement with the need outlined in the recommendation. The Board believes, however, that there is enough supporting evidence to ask the recipient to reconsider.
Recommendation Status Change SummaryThis link opens a new window
2017-07-I-WI-6
Contract a competent third party to perform personal protective equipment hazard analyses, such as those prescribed by NFPA 2113, Standard on Selection, Care, Use, and Maintenance of Flame-Resistant Garments for Protection of Industrial Personnel Against Short-Duration Thermal Exposures from Fire, and require appropriate flame-resistant garments for all operations that handle combustible dusts during normal and upset conditions.
Status:
Open - Unacceptable Response/No Response ReceivedThis link opens a new window
Open - Unacceptable Response/No Response Received (O - UR) - Recipient responds by expressing disagreement with the need outlined in the recommendation. The Board believes, however, that there is enough supporting evidence to ask the recipient to reconsider.
Recommendation Status Change SummaryThis link opens a new window
2017-07-I-WI-7
Contract a competent third party to update the facility emergency response plan and train all employees on updated emergency response plan. The update should include the guidance in NFPA 61, Standard for the Prevention of Fires and Dust Explosions in Agricultural and Food Processing Facilities, and NFPA 652, Standard on the Fundamentals of Combustible Dust, Chapter 8 and Section A.8.10.1, which includes, at a minimum, the following elements:
a. A signal or alarm system;
b. Emergency shutdown procedures;
c. Provide instructions for when and how to trigger emergency evacuations;
d. Provide instructions for when to notify emergency responders for need of assistance;
e. Response to potential fire scenarios, such as smoldering fires inside equipment; and
f. Prevent firefighting of process fires inside equipment.
Status:
Open - Unacceptable Response/No Response ReceivedThis link opens a new window
Open - Unacceptable Response/No Response Received (O - UR) - Recipient responds by expressing disagreement with the need outlined in the recommendation. The Board believes, however, that there is enough supporting evidence to ask the recipient to reconsider.
Recommendation Status Change SummaryThis link opens a new window
2017-07-I-WI-8
Contract a competent third party to assess and update the pre-deflagration detection and suppression engineering controls, such as those discussed in Chapter 9 of the 2019 edition of NFPA 69, Standard on Explosion Prevention Systems, for adequacy to detect and alarm employees of an emergency situation, such as a smoldering fire, and trigger an evacuation.
Status:
Open - Unacceptable Response/No Response ReceivedThis link opens a new window
Open - Unacceptable Response/No Response Received (O - UR) - Recipient responds by expressing disagreement with the need outlined in the recommendation. The Board believes, however, that there is enough supporting evidence to ask the recipient to reconsider.
Recommendation Status Change SummaryThis link opens a new window
2017-07-I-WI-9
Contract a competent third party to develop and implement a process safety leadership and culture program, based on the guidance of the CCPS’s Guidelines for Auditing Process Safety Management Systems and Process Safety: Leadership from the Boardroom to the Frontline. The program should include, at a minimum, the following elements:
a. A process safety policy;
b. A process safety leadership and culture committee;
c. Appropriate goals for process safety;
d. A commitment to process safety culture;
e. Leading and lagging process safety metrics;
f. Process Safety Culture Assessments; and,
g. Engagement with external process safety leadership and culture experts.
Status:
Open - Unacceptable Response/No Response ReceivedThis link opens a new window
Open - Unacceptable Response/No Response Received (O - UR) - Recipient responds by expressing disagreement with the need outlined in the recommendation. The Board believes, however, that there is enough supporting evidence to ask the recipient to reconsider.
Recommendation Status Change SummaryThis link opens a new window